Lisa Rachmat was punished more heavily than Ms. Ronald Tannur, Andi Syarifuddin: How is that fair?

FAJAR.CO.ID, JAKARTA – The reason the Public Prosecutor (JPU) filed an appeal on the verdict of the Jakarta PN Corruption Panel of Judges to Lisa Rachmat, was considered irrelevant and had no legal basis.

That was conveyed by Andi Syarifuddin SH MH, one of Lisa Rachmat’s attorney. “The reason for the prosecutor’s appeal on the verdict of the verdict to Lisa Rachmat did not have a legal basis, ” said Andi through his written statement, Saturday (6/28/2025).

Head of the Legal Information Center (Kapuspenkum) AGO Harli Siregar said, the prosecutor submitted an appeal on Lisa’s verdict. “Yes (submitting) appeal,” said Harli, Thursday (6/26/2025).

“The reason for appeal is because it is related to evidence that is returned. Even though the prosecutor demands to be seized,” said Harli. But not explained which evidence was questioned by the prosecutor.

The prosecutor demanded a 14 -year prison and a fine of Rp. 750 million, a subsidiary of six months in prison to Lisa Rachmat, Gregory’s lawyer Ronald Tannur. At the hearing at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court Court, Wednesday, 5/28/2025, the prosecutor also demanded the confiscated evidence to be seized for the state.

In this case, the prosecutor confiscated a number of items of evidence in the form of valuables, rupiah, Singapore dollars and US dollars from Lisa, David Rachmat (Lisa’s sister), and Linggo Hadiprayitno (Lisa’s husband), totaling around Rp27 billion.

The panel of judges sentenced to 11 years in prison and a fine of Rp750 million. The Assembly agreed with Lisa’s attorney, the evidence confiscated by the prosecutor must be returned to the defendant because the deeds charged to the defendant Lisa were bribery providers not the recipient of bribery.